Ethics Headlines
#81

Volume 2, Number 27                                                Friday, July 14, 2006


Ethics Headlines is an ethics-in-the-news clipping file published each Friday by Greg Feldmeth, a high school teacher at Polytechnic School in Pasadena, California. It contains news items from the media in the past week that deal with some area of ethical inquiry.

SUBSCRIBE. You can receive the file via email every Friday afternoon with links to the original articles.
Just email your address here and put Ethics Headlines in the subject line. If you know of others who would be interested, please forward the page to them.


This week's headlines--select the headline to read the article
  • Schoolbooks are given F’s in originality. This is how the 2005 edition of “A History of the United States,” a high school history textbook by the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Daniel J. Boorstin and Brooks Mather Kelley, relates the cataclysmic attacks of 9/11 for a new generation of young adults: “In New York City, the impact of the fully fueled jets caused the twin towers to burst into flames....” The language is virtually identical to that in the 2005 edition of another textbook, “America: Pathways to the Present,” by different authors. The books use substantially identical language to cover other subjects as well, including the disputed presidential election of 2000, the Persian Gulf war, the war in Afghanistan and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
  • From the high school front lines in the culture wars. A parent from Plymouth, N.Y., has sent along another example of liberals gone wild. Fishing through her son's backpack (he's a ninth grader), she found a crumpled up handout from the health teacher. The title caught her attention: "Dysfunctional 'Family Rules.'(Mona Charen)
  • Choosing baby's sex to be outlawed. Sex selection of babies for non-medical reasons is set to be outlawed in the UK under Government plans for a shake-up of embryology regulation. Health Minister Caroline Flint told MPs she was minded to introduce a "clear and specific ban" on the use of new techniques to choose one gender of baby.
  • How cloning stacks up. Cloning to reproduce a human being is now seen almost universally as too dangerous to consider. And animal cloning hasn't attained many of the goals expected a decade ago. Still, at least 15 mammals have been cloned (though no primates) and research continues.

Previous Issues