Back to Week 68 Ethics Headlines
Textbooks may have to tell gay role

By Aaron C. Davis
Knight Ridder Newspapers
April 8, 2006
Seattle Times

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The California state Senate will consider a bill that would require schools to teach students about the contributions gays and lesbians have made to society, an effort supporters say is an attempt to battle discrimination and opponents say is designed to use the classroom to get children to embrace homosexuality.

The bill, which a Senate committee approved Tuesday, would require schools to buy textbooks "accurately" portraying "the sexual diversity of our society."

More controversially, it could require that students hear history lessons on "the contributions of people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender to the economic, political, and social development of California and the United States of America."

The proposal, if it becomes law, could have far-reaching implications by setting a precedent and because California is the nation's largest textbook buyer and as such often sets the standards for publishers that sell nationwide.

The bill also could bring sex wars roaring back into California state politics in an election year in which gay-rights advocates had purposefully relegated gay marriage to the legislative backburner and signature gathering for propositions rolling back gay rights had begun to slow.

"We're totally opposed to inserting sexual orientation into textbooks in our schools. This is more than just accepting it, it's forcing our kids to embrace it, almost celebrate it," said Karen England, executive director of the conservative Capital Resource Institute, which thinks teachings about sexual orientation should be left to parents.

The bill's author, state Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, rejected the criticism. "We've been working since 1995 to try to improve the climate in schools for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender kids, as well as those kids who are just thought to be gay, because there is an enormous amount of harassment and discrimination at stake."

Kuehl pointed to research she said concludes that gay and lesbian students might do better in school, be less at risk for suicide, skipping school, or drug and alcohol abuse if they saw their own lives more accurately reflected in school textbooks and if the issue were more openly discussed in classrooms.

"Teaching materials mostly contain negative or adverse views of us, and that's when they mention us at all," said Kuehl, one of the California Legislature's six openly gay lawmakers.

The bill expands on the state education code that already requires inclusion in the curriculum of the historical role and contributions of members of ethnic and cultural groups.

But central to the coming legislative floor debates will be questions about how gay and lesbian issues might be woven into U.S. history.

"We're not suddenly going to say, 'so and so was gay' when they never said that," Kuehl said. "But if you're teaching Langston Hughes poetry, you get a twofer because he was admittedly gay and he was black. So you could say he was a gay, black poet and talk about that."

Aejaie Sellers, executive director of the Billy DeFrank LGBT Center in Santa Clara, said she thinks required gay and lesbian history lessons for students are a fantastic idea.

"Gays throughout history should be recognized. This is not something new, this goes back to the 18th and 17th and 16th century," she said, adding, "Who knows that the author of 'America the Beautiful,' Katharine Lee Bates, was gay?"

England said she doesn't really care because a person's contribution to history doesn't hinge on their sexual orientation.

"I don't care if, or who, whatever historical figure they want to say is gay," England said. "If we're discussing history, who someone had sex with is inappropriate."

Whether the bill becomes law and if gay-history lessons become mandatory might quickly become Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's call.

Schwarzenegger has not taken a position on the new bill.

Back to Week 68 Ethics Headlines